United States v. Juan Jose Ayala-Arroyo

Good Law
19 F.3d 29·1994 WL 83397·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12089
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 199493-30069California469 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Jose AYALA-ARROYO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30069. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 10, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Juan Jose Ayala-Arroyo appeals his conviction of having unlawfully reentered the United States having previously been deported following conviction of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 . We affirm his conviction. FACTS 4 On January 8, 1992 Ayala pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon to the felony of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. Under Oregon law, having pleaded guilty, he could only appeal his sentence. Oregon Revised Statutes 138.053. The appeal period expired February 7, 1992. 5 On January 30, 1992 a deportation hearing was held, and Ayala was ordered deported. He illegally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.