Harry James Seagrave v. Michael Hennessey

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harry James SEAGRAVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HENNESSEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 2, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Harry J. Seagrave appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Seagrave alleged violations of his constitutional rights during his incarceration in 1985 and 1986 in two jails operated by the County of San Francisco. 1 We review de novo, Darring v. Kincheloe, 783 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1986), and we affirm. 3 * Medical Care 4 Seagrave contends that he was deprived of adequate medical care because the defendants (1) failed to treat properly his heart condition and stomach ailments, and (2) failed to provide him with reading glasses and denture adhesive. We disagree. 5 To…