Serquina v. United States

Good Law
19 F.3d 29·1994 WL 76306·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12086
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 199493-55636California892 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arturo SERQUINA; Sixto T. Tongos; Melchor M. Gecozo; Ernesto R.R. Barbosa; Ubaldo R. Cantuba; Alfredo Inocencio; Reynaldo C. Castro; Antolin G. Villanueva; Federico R. Ruiz; Alfredo Hilao; Juanit Aglipay; Alfredo Almanzan; Juan Arcilla; Hilario Bolos; Lauro Castillos; Gregorio Castor; Conrado Cruz; Florenctino Cuaresma; Artemio Cabrera David; Virginia De Leon; Jose Estrella; Loreto Fabian; Dick Farrales; Aristides Garcia; Fidel Gobenciong; Constancio Gonzalez; Feliciano Laluan; Crisostomo Martinez; Felipe Oamar; Mario Prosntroller; Mabini Quimpo; Ismael Soriano; Jesus Tolentino; Ponciano Tubig; Domingo Vargas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; Immigration & Naturalization Service; Gene McNary, Commissioner of INS; James M. Bailey, Director INS Northern Service Center; Robert Moschorak, Director, INS Los Angeles District Office, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55636. United States Court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.