Mark Richardson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Mark Richardson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Opinion
Opinion
19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Mark RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-16755, 92-16770. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1994. Decided March 8, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and HILL, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (SFFCC) appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Mark Richardson and the denial of its cross motion for summary judgment. Richardson cross appeals from the district court's award of interest on the judgment calculated at the federal rate. 4 On appeal, SFFCC contends inter alia that the district court's rulings on the cross motions for summary judgment are erroneous because the comprehensive personal liability insurance policy…