United States v. Otuma Agadaga

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otuma AGADAGA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1993. * Decided March 2, 1994. Before: TANG, FARRIS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Otuma Agadaga ("Agadaga") appeals his convictions for one count of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341 , and one count of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1343 . Concerning the mail fraud count, Agadaga argues that there was insufficient evidence to prove the mailing of a $5,000 check as specifically alleged in the indictment. As to both counts, Agadaga argues reversible error in the making of certain erroneous evidentiary rulings. We affirm. I. 3 This was not a case devoid of any evidence of a mailing. Clearly, there was sufficient evidence to support the mailing of a $2,500 check; a fact not disputed by Agadaga. Rather, what Agadaga…