Curtis D. Stowell v. William Callahan Don Daniels Andy Bishop Tana Wood

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Curtis D. STOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William CALLAHAN; Don Daniels; Andy Bishop; Tana Wood, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36809. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 1, 1994. * Decided March 8, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stowell, a former inmate in the Washington state penitentiary system, brought a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against officials at McNeil Island Correction Center (MCC). Adopting the report and recommendation of a Magistrate Judge, the district court granted summary judgment in the defendants' favor. Stowell appeals. 3 Stowell has contended at all phases of this case that his removal as a kitchen clerk and his subsequent placement in cell confinement for refusing a janitorial assignment violate his due process and equal protection rights, double jeopardy, the Eighth Amendment, and his right to…