James Neal Siu-Chang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
19 F.3d 29·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12082
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 199492-70234California330 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Neal SIU-CHANG, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70234. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1993. Decided March 2, 1994. Before: TANG, FARRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 James Neal Siu-Chang has conceded his deportability and requests a waiver of deportability pursuant to Sec. 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(c). The Immigration Judge denied Siu-Chang's request for a waiver, and the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed Siu-Chang's appeal of the Immigration Judge's decision. Siu-Chang appeals the BIA's decision to deny him a waiver of deportability under Sec. 212(c). We have jurisdiction of the timely appeal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). 3 We review the BIA's denial of relief under Sec. 212(c) for abuse of discretion. Vargas v. INS, 831 F.2d 906 (9th Cir.1987). 4 Siu-Chang…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.