In Re Romulo Sarausad Rosa Sarausad, Debtors. Romulo Sarausad Rosa Sarausad v. Law Offices of Jean Schiedler-Brown & Associates

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Romulo SARAUSAD; Rosa Sarausad, Debtors. Romulo Sarausad; Rosa Sarausad, Appellants, v. LAW OFFICES OF JEAN SCHIEDLER-BROWN & ASSOCIATES, Appellee. No. 93-35240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1994. * Decided March 24, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chapter 13 debtors Romulo and Rosa Sarausad appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's order allowing the Law Offices of Jean Schiedler-Brown's ("Schiedler-Brown") claim for $16,882.76 in attorney's fees. We dismiss in part and affirm in part. 3 We first consider sua sponte the scope of our jurisdiction over this appeal. See Hostler v. Groves, 912 F.2d 1158, 1160 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 420 (1991). 4 The BAP entered its judgment on December 30, 1992. The Sarasauds filed a motion for rehearing on January 13,…