In Re James W. Summers Et Ux., Debtor. William C. Summers v. James Rigby, Trustee in Bankruptcy

Good Law
19 F.3d 29·1994 WL 96365·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12096
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 199492-36968California945 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re James W. SUMMERS; et ux., Debtor. William C. SUMMERS, Appellant, v. James RIGBY, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellee. No. 92-36968. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1994. * Decided March 24, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chapter 7 debtor William C. Summers appeals pro se the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order granting the trustee's motion for summary judgment and denying Summers discharge in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 727 . The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's finding that there was no genuine issue as to whether Summers had transferred property within one year of filing his bankruptcy petition in order to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 "We review the bankruptcy court's grant of summary judgment, as affirmed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.