Jerardo Rodriguez v. Frank Leslie Hall

Good Law
19 F.3d 29
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 199492-36831California1,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerardo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank Leslie HALL; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36831. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Withdrawn Jan. 5, 1994. Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 1994. As Amended Jan. 18, 1994. ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on 29 June 1993, in this matter is withdrawn. The attached memorandum disposition is hereby issued in its place. The petition for rehearing is denied. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerardo Rodriguez, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting appellees' motion for summary judgment on his claim that his constitutional rights were violated when female prison officials were allowed to view him naked. Rodriguez also appeals the district court's order dismissing, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), his claim that mail from the courts and State…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.