United States v. David Scott Camp

19 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Scott CAMP, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided Feb. 28, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Scott Camp appeals his conviction, which followed a conditional plea of guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Camp argues that the district court erred by refusing to suppress incriminating statements elicited in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo whether the Fifth Amendment requires suppression of a custodial statement. United States v. Lucas, 963 F.2d 243, 245 (9th Cir.1992). We review for clear error the factual determination whether inquiries of a suspect in custody constitute interrogation. United…