United States v. James Lee Boy, United States of America v. James Lee Boy

19 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Lee BOY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Lee BOY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-30100, 93-30133. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 31, 1994. * Decided Feb. 25, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant James Lee Boy appeals his jury convictions for abusive sexual contact, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1153 & 2244, and aggravated sexual abuse and attempted aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1153 & 2241(c). The United States cross-appeals the district court's downward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm appellant's convictions and sentence. 4 * Appellant's central argument is that the district court erred in admitting expert medical testimony under the medical treatment exception to the hearsay…