United States v. Daniel Dean Bryan, United States of America v. Charles Lee Young, United States of America v. William Eugene Forry

19 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Dean BRYAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Lee YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Eugene FORRY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-50723, 92-50731 and 92-50734. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. Decided March 1, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN, HALL, Circuit Judges, and TANNER. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Daniel Dean Bryan, Charles Lee Young, and William Forry appeal their jury convictions and sentences for possession and manufacture of methamphetamine. 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). They argue that the district court erred in denying their motion to suppress evidence. In addition, Young and Forry contend that their possession convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence and all three defendants argue that the district court erred in…