United States v. Frederick Hargrove Jackson

19 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frederick Hargrove JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10019. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 16, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederick Hargrove Jackson appeals his conviction, following jury trial, for money laundering and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1956 (a)(1)(A)(i), 2. Jackson contends (1) the district court erred by denying his motions to dismiss the indictment due to pre-indictment delay and violation of the Speedy Trial Act, and (2) the government failed to disclose Jencks Act material, thereby depriving him of a fair trial. The government concedes that the district court should have conducted an in camera review of the alleged Jencks Act material. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we vacate and remand for further…