United States v. Kenneth D. Bendickson

19 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth D. BENDICKSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10411. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 24, 1994. * Decided March 3, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kenneth D. Bendickson appeals his conviction imposed following entry of an unconditional guilty plea to attempt to manufacture methamphetamine and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(a)(1), and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 , and use of a weapon in narcotics trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bendickson's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no arguable issues for review and filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.…