United States v. David Lee Dean
Opinion
Opinion
19 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee DEAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50479. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 11, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Lee Dean appeals his 262-month sentence imposed following a jury trial for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Dean contends the district court erred by determining he was an armed career criminal under the Sentencing Guidelines and the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (e)(1), because two of the three prior convictions were not "committed on occasions different from one another." We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's determination whether predicate convictions occurred too closely in time to be counted separately for…