United States v. Salvador Flores-Rodriguez

19 F.3d 30 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador FLORES-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided Feb. 25, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Salvador Flores-Rodriguez appeals his 60-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. Flores-Rodriguez contends (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing when his attorney did not object to the presentence report and did not move to enforce the plea agreement and (2) the district court did not comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32. We dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. 3 * Background 4 Flores-Rodriguez entered a guilty plea and was sentenced in 1990. His appointed counsel, Jack Boltax, did not file…