United States v. Darcy Ira Thigpen Robert Ross, Dwayne Allen Falconer

19 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darcy Ira THIGPEN; Robert Ross, Dwayne Allen Falconer, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-50043, 93-50058 and 93-50067. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 7, 1993. Decided Feb. 25, 1994. 1 Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON and HALL, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Appellants Thigpen, Ross, and Falconer separately appeal their convictions for possession of cocaine and cocaine base with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1); conspiracy, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 ; possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1); and being felons in possession of firearms, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g). Thigpen and Falconer also appeal their sentences. 4 These appeals raise two suppression of evidence issues, two sufficiency of evidence issues, and two sentencing issues. First, Ross and Falconer argue that there was no probable…