United States v. Cecil Lacroix

19 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecil LaCROIX, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30266. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1993. * Decided Feb. 25, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Cecil LaCroix appeals the district court's affirmance of his conviction following jury trial before a magistrate for driving while intoxicated in violation of the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. Secs. 7 , 13, and Wash.Rev.Code Secs. 46.61.502, 515. LaCroix contends the district court erred by affirming the magistrate judge's denial of his motion to suppress incriminating statements made while he was in custody. LaCroix argues that the arresting military police officer did not adequately inform him of his right to counsel as required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 1 3 We review…