United States v. Larry F. Perrin

19 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry F. PERRIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-36767. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 31, 1994. * Decided Feb. 25, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Larry F. Perrin, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to set aside the sentence following his guilty plea to manufacturing 100 or more marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Perrin contends that he is entitled to relief because (1) the written plea agreement entered into with the government was breached; (2) his attorney provided ineffective assistance by not objecting to the breach; and (3) the trial court did not inform him that his guilty plea could form the basis of future sentence enhancements. 4 Section 2255 requires the district court to hold an evidentiary…