United States v. Juan Ignacio Resendiz-Lopez

19 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ignacio RESENDIZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 15, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Juan Ignacio Resendiz-Lopez appeals his 80-month sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to illegal reentry into the United States after prior deportation and prior conviction of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (a), (b)(2). Counsel for Resendiz-Lopez filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified one possible issue for review: whether the sentence imposed was unconstitutionally disproportionate to the crime committed. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The 80-month sentence imposed for an offense with a statutory maximum sentence…