United States v. Jack Townsend

19 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack TOWNSEND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30293. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 16, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jack Townsend appeals his convictions and 211-month sentence imposed following a jury trial for manufacturing and conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846, and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c). 3 Counsel for Townsend filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identifies five issues for review: (1) whether the district court abused its discretion by rejecting Townsend's proposed questions for voir dire; (2) whether the district court erred by admitting Townsend's statements to law enforcement agents; (3)…