United States v. Judy D. Moll

Good Law
19 F.3d 31·1994 WL 65045·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12131
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 199490-30006California935 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 31 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Judy D. MOLL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-30006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided Feb. 28, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Judy D. Moll appeals her conviction and sentence of 60 months, imposed following jury trial, for conspiring to manufacture and manufacturing more than 100 marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(vii) and 846. Moll contends that she received ineffective assistance at trial and from her first appointed counsel on appeal. She also argues that the district court erred, first, by failing to instruct the jury adequately on the law of conspiracy and, second, by imposing a $45,000 fine. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Ineffective Assistance 4 Generally, "we will not review challenges to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.