Ludwig Von Der Luhe v. Terrence Golden United States General Services Administration
Opinion
Opinion
19 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ludwig VON DER LUHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terrence GOLDEN; United States General Services Administration, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56361. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1994. * Decided March 9, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 AMENDED MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ludwig Von Der Luhe appeals pro se the district court's judgment, after a bench trial, in favor of the General Services Administration ("GSA") and GSA Administrator Terence Golden in Von Der Luhe's employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 794 . Von Der Luhe contends the district court erred by concluding that he failed to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment based upon his national origin (German), his speech impediment, or retaliation for bringing a prior…