United States v. Lawrence Wallace

19 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lawrence WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 2, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence Wallace appeals his convictions, following a conditional guilty plea, for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a)(d), use of a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c), and being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Wallace contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from a car in which he was a passenger, because officers lacked reasonable suspicion for the initial investigatory stop. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's denial of a motion…