United States v. Yat Wah Yuk, Aka: Jonathan Yok, Eric Yuk, Eric Wah, Andrew Shiau, Yat Wah, Yat Yuk Shau

Good Law
19 F.3d 32·1994 WL 68237·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12103
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 199493-50542California557 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 32 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yat Wah YUK, aka: Jonathan Yok, Eric Yuk, Eric Wah, Andrew Shiau, Yat Wah, Yat Yuk Shau, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50542. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 24, 1994. * Decided March 3, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Yat Wah Yuk appeals the $4000 fine imposed upon him in connection with his guilty plea for two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922 (g)(1), 924(d)(1). Yuk contends the district court erred by imposing the fine despite his inability to pay. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 3 We review for clear error a district court's determination that a defendant has the ability to pay a fine. United States v. Favorito, 5 F.3d 1338, 1339 (9th Cir.1993), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Dec. 27, 1993)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.