Clostermann v. Johnson

Good Law
19 F.3d 1439·1994 WL 88605·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 199492-36779California798 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 1439 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Adelbert G. CLOSTERMANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lee JOHNSON; Charles Crookham; Ruth Cinnegar; Warren Deras; Oregon State University Foundation, Inc.; Catholic Archdiocese of Oregon, Inc.; University of Portland, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36779. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 16, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Adelbert G. Clostermann appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to file an amended complaint as directed by the court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's decision for abuse of discretion, Eldridge v. Block, 832 F.2d 1132, 1136 (9th Cir.1987), and we affirm. 3 Clostermann is a former attorney who once represented Martin Zirmer, for whom he prepared a will in which he was named personal representative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.