Farrukh Mohammad v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

19 F.3d 1440 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Farrukh MOHAMMAD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70837. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 16, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Farrukh Mohammad, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal for failure to specify adequately the grounds for the appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. Sec. 3.1(d)(1-a)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and deny the petition for review. 3 * Background 4 Mohammad entered the United States in January 1991 as a nonimmigrant visitor with permission to remain for six months. On October 2, 1991, the Immigration and Naturalization Service issued an order to show cause charging Mohammad with being deportable pursuant to section…