852152 Ontario, Inc. v. Dollar Systems, Inc.

Good Law
19 F.3d 1440
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 19941440California1,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 1440 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 852152 ONTARIO, INC., a Canadian corporation; Dollar Rent A Car Systems (Canada) Inc., a Canadian corporation; 411696 Alberta Ltd., a Canadian corporation; 410541 Alberta Ltd., a Canadian corporation; 1973054 Nova Scotia Ltd., a Canadian corporation; Dollar Rent A Car (Toronto), a Canadian corporation; Dollar Leasing, Inc., a Canadian corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DOLLAR SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation; Dollar Rent A Car Systems, Inc., a California corporation; Gary L. Paxton, an individual, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-55986. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1994. * Decided March 16, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 On June 1, 1992, Diane Sherman, the attorney for Dollar Systems, filed a motion for reconsideration of her previous motion to stay the case between Dollar and 852152 Ontario. The district court denied the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.