Daniel Logan v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
Opinion
19 F.3d 1440 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel LOGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-56129. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1994. * Decided March 18, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Logan appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Logan argues: (1) that the administrative law judge's (ALJ's) determination that Logan had the ability to control his consumption of alcohol was not supported by substantial evidence; (2) that the ALJ's decision to disregard the opinions of Logan's treating physicians was not supported by clear and convincing evidence; and (3) that the ALJ erred by not considering Logan's impairments in combination. We reverse and remand for an award of benefits. 3 I. The Opinions of Logan's Treating Physicians 4 On…