United States v. Karl Lee Free

19 F.3d 1441 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl Lee FREE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30059. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 11, 1994. Decided March 24, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * I. 3 Free contends his release from prison on prior charges restored his right to possess long guns under Oregon law and, consequently, his prior convictions cannot serve to enhance his current sentence. This argument fails for three reasons. First, it is made for the first time on appeal. See, e.g., United States v. Kimball, 896 F.2d 1218, 1219 (9th Cir.1990), vacated in part on other grounds, 925 F.2d 356, 358 (9th Cir.1991) (en banc). 4 Second, Free relies on the date on which he was placed on "long term temporary release," October 17, 1989, rather than on the date he was formally paroled, April 16, 1990. Even assuming "long term…