United States v. Miquel Calderon-Menendez, AKA Miquel Calderon-Melendez

Good Law
19 F.3d 1441
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 199493-10179California255 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 1441 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miquel CALDERON-MENENDEZ, aka Miquel Calderon-Melendez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10179. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 14, 1994. As Amended March 30, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Miguel Calderon-Menendez appeals his convictions and 120-month sentence, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to possess or distribute and attempting to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Calderon-Menendez's counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record and a brief stating that she finds no arguable issues for review. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.