United States v. John Anthony Green
Opinion
Opinion
19 F.3d 1441 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Anthony GREEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50529. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 14, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Anthony Green appeals his conviction following remand from this court for resentencing. Green was originally convicted, following jury trial, for photographing counterfeit obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 474 . He contends that the district court erred by denying his motion made after remand to dismiss the indictment for outrageous government conduct. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Generally, "a party must raise all claims of error in a single appeal following final judgment on the merits." Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 374 (1981) (noting that collateral orders are…