United States v. Rosa Yolanda Salazar

Good Law
19 F.3d 1442·1994 WL 87350·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 199493-50242California535 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 1442 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rosa Yolanda SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50242. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 14, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rosa Yolanda Salazar appeals her conviction and 48-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to knowing and intentional use of a telephone in facilitating the commission of a drug offense in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 843 (b). Salazar contends that the district court erred by (1) denying her motion to suppress evidence and (2) failing to make express findings regarding the amount of drugs involved in the conspiracy attributable to her. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm the judgment of conviction but vacate the sentence and remand the case to the district court for resentencing. 3 * Motion to Suppress 4 Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.