United States v. Timothy J. Richardson

Good Law
19 F.3d 1442·1994 WL 88785·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 199493-30007California354 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 1442 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy J. RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30007. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 11, 1994. * Decided March 16, 1994. Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Timothy Richardson appeals his sentence on three counts of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2113 (a) and (d), and one count of using a firearm during a federal crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c). We review the district court's interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. United States v. Young, 988 F.2d 1002, 1003 (9th Cir.1993). 3 Richardson claims the district court erred in enhancing his sentence for the use of a firearm under U.S.S.G. Sec. 2B3.1(b)(2) because he also received a statutory enhancement under section 924(c). But Richardson committed three armed robberies; the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.