United States v. Maria Dolores Triste, United States of America v. Bartolo Navarro-Ortiz

Good Law
19 F.3d 1442·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13521
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 199493-10336California853 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 1442 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria Dolores TRISTE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bartolo NAVARRO-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10336, 93-10367. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 16, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Codefendants Maria Dolores Triste and Bartolo Navarro-Ortiz appeal their convictions for, respectively, conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846 and possession with with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Triste was convicted following jury trial and Navarro-Ortiz entered a conditional guilty plea. Both contend the district court erred by denying their motion to suppress evidence because Border Patrol Agents lacked…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.