United States v. Corey Maurice Treadwell

19 F.3d 1442 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey Maurice TREADWELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50354. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 1, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Corey M. Treadwell appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for armed bank robbery and using a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2113 (a), (d) and Secs. 924(c), (d). We affirm. 3 Treadwell first argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove that the First Interstate Bank he was charged with robbing was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). We disagree. 1 The government's evidence that the victim bank was insured by the FDIC included: (1) testimony by a bank employee that the bank was federally insured, (2) a certified copy of the bank's FDIC certificate…