Miguel Urrieta-Molina v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

19 F.3d 1442 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Miguel URRIETA-MOLINA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70078. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 1, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Miguel Urrieta-Molina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge's decision finding him deportable as charged and denying his application for voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a). We review for substantial evidence the BIA's finding that Urrieta-Molina was statutorily ineligible for voluntary departure, see Mabugat v. INS, 937 F.2d 426, 431 (9th Cir.1991), and we deny the petition for review. BACKGROUND 3 On May 25, 1985, the Immigration and Naturalization Service served Urrieta-Molina…