Employee Staffing Services, Inc. v. Aubry

Good Law
20 F.3d 1038·94 Daily Journal DAR 4542·18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1033·28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 754·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6382
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 199493-15482California2,491 words

Opinion

Opinion

20 F.3d 1038 62 USLW 2637 , 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 1033 EMPLOYEE STAFFING SERVICES, INC., in its capacity as sponsor and plan administrator of the Employee Staffing Services Employee Welfare Benefit Plan; The Employee Staffing Services Employee Welfare Benefit Plan; Human Resource Technology dba Stafcor; and Pro City Apparel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lloyd W. AUBRY, Jr., as Director of the Department of Industrial Relations for the State of California; Victoria L. Bradshaw, as Labor Commissioner for the State of California, and California State Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Defendants-Appellees, and International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO, Intervenor-Appellee. No. 93-15482. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. Decided April 5, 1994. Karen E. Ford and James P. Baker, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy, & Mathiason, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. H. Thomas Cadell, Jr., Chief Counsel, Div. of Labor Standards Enforcement, John M. Rea, Chief Counsel, Dept. of Indus. Relations, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees. Marsha S. Berzon, Michael Rubin,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.