In Re Anderson

Good Law
21 F.3d 355·94 Daily Journal DAR 4855·30 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1570·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7047·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2526
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 199492-35120California1,956 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 355 62 USLW 2687 , Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,827 In re Vincent George ANDERSON, Jr. and Charolette Kay Anderson, Debtors. Vincent George ANDERSON, Jr., and Charolette Kay Anderson, Appellants, v. Herb SATTERLEE, Jr., Trustee, Appellee. No. 92-35120. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. Decided April 12, 1994. Peter H. Arkison, Bellingham, WA, for debtors/appellants. Michael D. Bohannon and Cynthia A. Kuno, Foster Pepper & Shefelman, Seattle, WA, for trustee/appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Before BROWNING, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 Vincent Anderson and Charolette Anderson (the "Andersons"), husband and wife, appeal the district court's affirmance of a bankruptcy court order denying confirmation of their Chapter 13 personal bankruptcy plan. Herb Satterlee, the Trustee, maintains that the bankruptcy court and district court correctly interpreted 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1325 (b)(1)(B) to require, as a prerequisite to Chapter 13 confirmation, that a plan provide that the debtor pay all actual disposable income to the Chapter 13…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.