Ex Parte Sylvester

Good Law
1889 Cal. LEXIS 1011·81 Cal. 199·22 P. 550
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1889No. 20566California255 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

The petitioner, James Sylvester, was convicted in the police court of the city of Eureka of a violation of ordinance No. 55, ordained by the common council of that city, and sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars, and in case the fine was not paid, to be imprisoned in the county jail of Humboldt County in the proportion of one day for each dollar of the fine, and he was, under the judgment, delivered to the custody of the sheriff. The said ordinance prohibits the carrying of concealed weapons within the city limits, and provides that any person violating it "shall be fined in a sum not to exceed one hundred dollars, or imprisonment in the city prison not to exceed ten days, or by both such fine or imprisonment.”

*200 • Petitioner relies upon several grounds for his release, but it is necessary to notice only one.

Whether or not, for a mere violation of a city ordiance, the common council could have legally provided for a judgment imprisoning petitioner in the county jail, an institution controlled by the supervisors, where additional penalties of hard labor, etc., were imposed, presents a question not necessary to be here determined. There was no attempt to exercise such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.