Walkerly

Walkerly v. Bacon

Good Law
1889 Cal. LEXIS 1056·81 Cal. 579·22 P. 888
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 2, 1889No. 12950California321 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

This is an appeal by the trustees and legatees under the will of the testator from an order setting apart to the widow and child of the deceased a homestead.

*580 The whole of the property of the deceased was his separate property, and was of the value of five hundred thousand dollars over and above the indebtedness. The homestead occupied by the family at his death was of the value of eighteen thousand dollars, and was indivisible. The court below set apart this homestead to the widow and child for a limited time. It is contended that this was error, for the reason that the court could not set apart a probate homestead greater in value than five thousand dollars.

The provisions of the code authorizing a homestead to be set apart to the family of a decedent, where none has been selected before his death, contains no limitation as to the value of such homestead. (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 1465, 1468.) There is such a limitation where a homestead is declared before his death. (Code Civ. Proc., vsecs. 1474, 1475.) And in that case, where it is sought to have the same set apart to the family after his death, provision is made for a sale of the property and payment of five thousand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.