Edward E. Allen v. Clackamas County Jail

21 F.3d 1111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward E. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY JAIL; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35260. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 22, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward E. Allen, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on certain claims, and the dismissal of his remaining claim after trial in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. In his complaint, Allen alleged that defendants violated his constitutional rights when they: (a) ignored his request to provide legal forms and cases to do legal work; (b) refused to provide him with an ink pen and legal-sized paper; (c) lost or destroyed his legal materials; and (d) required him to receive food while standing in water. The district court dismissed the claim regarding lost or…