Randolph Anthony Chevers v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
21 F.3d 1111·1994 WL 124481·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20125
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 199493-70698California631 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randolph Anthony CHEVERS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70698. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 12, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randolph Anthony Chevers, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge's ("IJ") decision finding him deportable as charged and denying his application for a waiver of deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 Following the IJ's decision, Chevers timely filed a notice of appeal with the BIA, and indicated that he would file a brief on appeal. However, despite obtaining an extension…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.