Andres Carrasco-Aragon v. United States

Good Law
21 F.3d 1111·1994 WL 108026·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20113
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 199493-35597California1,240 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andres CARRASCO-ARAGON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35597. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1994. * Decided March 28, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andres Carrasco-Aragon, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. Carrasco-Aragon pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, conspiracy to distribute heroin, possession with intent to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin, possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine and use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. He contends that the district court erred by denying his Rule 35 motion. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm in part and vacate in part. 3 On January 13, 1989,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.