Attakai v. United States

21 F.3d 1111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roger ATTAKAI; Tom Pahe; David Clark; Askie Tso; Mae Tso; Betty Tso; Pauline Whitesinger, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Interior; Ross O. Swimmer; Bureau of Indian Affairs; Hawley Atkinson; Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, Defendants- Appellees. No. 92-17064. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 18, 1994. Decided April 6, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, BOOCHEVER, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 We AFFIRM the award of attorney fees to Attakai for the reasons set forth in the district court's order filed August 18, 1992. We note that Claims III, IV, VI and VII were also unrelated to Attakai's successful claim under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 470f (1988), and so fees for work on those claims were properly denied. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication…