Darlene Burley v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company

21 F.3d 1111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darlene BURLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16392. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 22, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In this Title VII action, Darlene Burley appeals pro se the district court's denial of her post-judgment motion for reconsideration. We affirm. 3 On April 23, 1993, the district court granted the appellee's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action. On May 6, 1993, Burley filed a motion to amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). On May 18, 1993, the district court denied the Rule 59(e) motion. On June 1, 1993, Burley filed a "petition for review," in which she alleged that she had newly discovered evidence and requested that the district court allow the case to proceed to trial. On June 7, 1993, the district…