Taisto Rivera Demuniz v. Oregon Parole Board

Good Law
21 F.3d 1112·1994 WL 146117·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20106
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 199493-35896California1,682 words

Opinion

Opinion

21 F.3d 1112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Taisto Rivera DEMUNIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON PAROLE BOARD, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35896. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 25, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Taisto Rivera Demuniz appeals the district court's denial of his habeas petition challenging the Oregon Board of Parole's failure to inform him of his right to appeal the Board's decision regarding his release date. We have jurisdiction of the timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. I. 3 On May 7, 1987, Demuniz was convicted of attempted murder and assault in the first degree under the name of Rohn Derrick Dorsey. He received an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment for a period not to exceed 10 years, with a requirement that he serve a minimum of 48 months before becoming eligible for parole. 4 On June 25, 1991,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.