Taisto Rivera Demuniz v. Oregon Parole Board
Opinion
Opinion
21 F.3d 1112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Taisto Rivera DEMUNIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON PAROLE BOARD, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35896. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 25, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Taisto Rivera Demuniz appeals the district court's denial of his habeas petition challenging the Oregon Board of Parole's failure to inform him of his right to appeal the Board's decision regarding his release date. We have jurisdiction of the timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. I. 3 On May 7, 1987, Demuniz was convicted of attempted murder and assault in the first degree under the name of Rohn Derrick Dorsey. He received an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment for a period not to exceed 10 years, with a requirement that he serve a minimum of 48 months before becoming eligible for parole. 4 On June 25, 1991,…