Daniel Dilley v. Bryant S. Gunn, Warden B. Schelke Norma Wells

21 F.3d 1112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel DILLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryant S. GUNN, Warden; B. Schelke; Norma Wells, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55902. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 24, 1994. * Decided March 30, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Daniel Dilley appeals pro se the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction and entry of partial summary judgment for Dilley on some claims and for the defendants on others. Dilley alleges that the law library at Calipatria State Prison and other prison conditions are unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1) to review the district court's denial of Dilley's request for a preliminary injunction. We, however, lack jurisdiction over the remainder of Dilley's appeal. We affirm in part and dismiss in part. 3 * Background 4 Dilley's first amended complaint…