F. Farah Etemad v. State of California Department of Water Resources Control Board

21 F.3d 1112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. F. Farah ETEMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55289. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 11, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 F. Farah Etemad appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of her amended complaint against the State of California Department of Water Resources Control Board ("Board") alleging deprivation of civil rights, discrimination in employment on the basis of race, sex, and national origin, conspiracy, harassment, retaliation, unfair labor practices, obstruction of justice, perjury, deprivation of privacy, and negligence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm in part and vacate and remand in part. 3 The Board hired Etemad as a Industrial Hygienist and terminated…